![]() I was particularly impressed by the Gskyer Telescope's ability to capture faint deep-sky objects. The included accessories, such as the smartphone adapter and multiple eyepieces, add to the versatility of the telescope, making it suitable for both beginners and more experienced observers. The sturdy aluminum tripod provides a stable foundation, and the adjustable height allows for comfortable viewing at various angles. Setting up the telescope was a breeze, thanks to the clear and concise instructions provided. Viewing Jupiter and its Galilean moons was a breathtaking experience, with each moon distinctly visible. I was amazed by the level of detail I could observe on the lunar surface, with craters and ridges coming into focus in stunning clarity. The fully coated glass optics provide sharp and vibrant images of the moon, planets, and deep-sky objects. One of the standout features of the Gskyer Telescope is its exceptional optics. From its impressive build quality to the clarity it offers during celestial observations, the Gskyer Telescope has proven to be an outstanding instrument for amateur astronomers and stargazing enthusiasts alike. I recently had the pleasure of experiencing the night sky like never before with the Gskyer Telescope, and I must say that this telescope has truly exceeded my expectations. But if at all possible, save up and get a larger aperture. If you absolutely MUST get an entry-level telescope, this is a good choice. But, like all entry-level telescopes, this is harder to use and not powerful enough to see much.Īll the time required to hunt for things, for what many may consider a disappointing result, could potentially end up killing a kid's enthusiasm. It'll serve our needs while we save up for an upgrade. I consider it worth the effort, but my back is killing me today.ĭon't get me wrong, for an entry-level telescope, this is good. We couldn't make out any detail or the distinctive eye-shape that can be seen with even slightly larger scopes. Galaxies, most nebulas, and many star clusters are beyond the ability of this telescope, but that being said, I was able to see a planetary nebula called The Ghost of Jupiter last night.įor perspective, I've had a few weeks of use and practice, and feel comfortable with the telescope, and have a number of apps, charts, and star maps to help me find things, and it STILL took over an hour for me to finally find it, put it close enough to the center of my field of view to use with max magnification, and put it in focus.Īnd even then, it looked like a hazy, bluish star. It's too bright, even at its dimmest, to make out any detail, but you can see what phase it's in. ![]() Especially now, near the end of April 2020, it is the brightest it'll be all year, so we've been looking at it every night. Venus, on the other hand, is very easy to see. And you can just make out Saturn's rings. You can make out SOME faint detail on Jupiter, especially if you go away from light pollution on a clear, moonless night. Even Mars is difficult to see through this telescope, and you can't make out any detail whatsoever on the surface. Which means that all the time you spend hunting for things, you'll having to be hunched over, crouched down, or kneeling on the ground.Īnd if you live in a place with a lot of light pollution, you won't be able to see much more than stars, the Moon, or the brightest planets. My kid doesn't have the patience or attention span for that, but I rather enjoy the challenge, so I do it. And with this telescope, far more time is spent hunting for objects than actually looking at them. This is something well-known in the amateur astronomy group I've joined, and they never, EVER recommend buying a beginner telescope, ESPECIALLY for kids.īecause most kids like looking AT stuff more than looking FOR it. However, if I could do it over again, I would've spent more and gone with a better one.įirst, as with all beginner telescopes, it is actually much harder to use than a more intermediate level one. It's typical for an "entry-level" telescope, and a decent value for the money if you want to get into stargazing without dropping 500 bucks or more on a bigger scope. This is a 70mm aperture (2.75 inches), which is about as small as you can get. The bigger the aperture, the better the image will be. In telescopes, the aperture size matters much more than magnification. Now I know more, I think this is a decent value, but it comes with A LOT of cons. I bought this knowing nothing about telescopes and not knowing what I could expect to see through this thing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |